Liebeck explained that he was in the water because he wanted the temperature to fall. The only thing I was attempting to do was make money. People have since claimed hot coffee is a health risk against Burger King, Dunkin’ Donuts, Starbucks, Continental Airlines, and other businesses. According to the juror, the initial award certainly got everyone’s attention, but not necessarily in a favorable way. The amount was later reduced to around $650,000, and it was further reduced after that. However, because of her actions, the amount was reduced to $160,000.
Jennifer Liebeck was initially ordered to pay punitive damages of $2 million, which they calculated to be equivalent to two days of coffee sales.
#STELLA LIEBECK BURNS SKIN#
In this case, jurors sided with the plaintiff, who required extensive skin grafts and surgery. Fast-food scandals have erupted over the years, and you’ll learn about ten of them. Liebeck is awarded a jury-awarded jackpot of over $2 million in her lawsuit. Her stomach was burned over 14% of her body in a cup of coffee spills on her lap. Stella Liebeck, 79, was eating at McDonald’s with her grandson in the passenger seat of his car in Albuquerque. The jury awarded her $2.86 million, which was later reduced to $640,000. In 1994, Stella Liebeck won a lawsuit against McDonald’s after she was burned by their coffee. Who Won The Mcdonald’s Hot Coffee Lawsuit? His re-election bid was ended in 2008 due to the taint of previous indictments. In the end, it took three years for Diaz to clear his name after he was acquitted of all charges. In an effort to defeat Diaz, the USCC spent a significant amount of money in the negative campaign. McDonald’s coffee is now served at 77 degrees Fahrenheit or 170 degrees Celsius. She claimed in her lawsuit that McDonald’s had over 700 reports of similar incidents and did nothing to address them. Her legs had third- degree burns that required skin grafts.
Stella Liebeck of New Mexico got coffee from McDonald’s and it was a good cup of coffee. The jury’s decision was justified, and Liebeck was rightfully compensated for her injuries. The company did not take the necessary precautions to protect its customers, and as a result, Liebeck was seriously injured. In light of these facts, it is clear that McDonald’s was at fault in the Liebeck case. The company knew that its coffee was significantly hotter than coffee served at other restaurants, yet it did not warn customers of this fact. McDonald’s was aware of the dangers posed by its hot coffee, yet it failed to take steps to protect its customers. However, a closer look at the case reveals that the jury’s decision was not as unreasonable as it may initially seem. The verdict in the Liebeck case was widely criticized, with many people claiming that Liebeck was not entitled to such a large award. The case went to trial, and Liebeck was awarded $2.86 million in damages. Liebeck filed a lawsuit against McDonald’s, claiming that the company was responsible for her injuries. In 1992, a cup of coffee from McDonald’s spilled into the lap of Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman, causing her to suffer severe burns.
0 kommentar(er)
